Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon W3550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3917 days newer than Xeon W3550.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Remnant II than Xeon W3550 - 90 vs 79 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon W3550 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3550 - 16 vs 8 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
90
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$444.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$444.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 9th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3550 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Aug 9th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |