Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700K outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700K is 3490 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon W3520 - 179 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3520 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$458.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$458.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |