Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 5028 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 84% better in Starfield than Xeon W3520 - 79 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 24 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
79
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$587.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$587.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43990 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Single-Core
413
15.520481022172117%
Multi-Core
1395
9.014539579967689%
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i7 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |