Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon W3520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 4602 days newer than Xeon W3520.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon W3520 - 258 vs 229 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon W3520 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3520 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$398.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$398.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 30th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3520 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |