Buy on Amazon
CA$388
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2999
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon W-3175X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 456 days newer than Xeon W-3175X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 56 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon W-3175X - 219 vs 217 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 65 vs 255 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
219
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.77/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 10 |
56 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 255 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
