Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 757 days newer than Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-7100 - 187 vs 184 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 56 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 51 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
184
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$106.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$106.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
255 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |