Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 6% better in Fortnite than FX-8300 - 224 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - CA$83.46 vs CA$118.88
- Up to 26% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i3-7100 - CA$0.39 vs CA$0.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
224
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.53/FPS
73%
Price, CA$
CA$118.88
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$118.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15351 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
212
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |