Buy on Amazon
CA$388
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 22% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E5645 - 147 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5645 - 20 vs 12 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
