Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3400 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 19% better in Rust than Xeon E5645 - 179 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$142.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$142.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |