Buy on Amazon
CA$174.79
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 3698 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 37% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E5645 - 186 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
186
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$174.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-10500 Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.5 GHz LGA1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110500
Buy for CA$174.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Core i5-10500
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5645 or Core i5-10500
Dirt 5, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High
61 FPS
CA$20.08/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Core i5-10500
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,224.99
In Stock
61 FPS
CA$20.49/FPS
GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Core i5-10500
8 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
CA$1,249.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
