Key Differences
In short — FX-6100 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6100 is 575 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5645 - 166 vs 165 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
166
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$80.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$80.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8942 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |