Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3123 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Xeon E5620 - 199 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 24 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1028.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,028.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |