Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon E5620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 3139 days newer than Xeon E5620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5620
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 80 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Metro Exodus than Xeon E5620 - 145 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5620 - 20 vs 8 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
145
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1300
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5620 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |