Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Xeon E5-2690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2690.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2690 - 179 vs 159 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2690 - 65 vs 135 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$444.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$444.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2690 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |