Buy on Amazon
CA$484.48
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon E5-2667 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2977 days newer than Xeon E5-2667.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2667 - 183 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 - 20 vs 12 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$484.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900KF (Base Stroke: 3.70GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 125 watt) Box
Buy for CA$484.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2667
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 10 |
| 12 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
