Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 946 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 127 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 95 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
127
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$389.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$389.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |