Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 1729 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - CA$141.17 vs CA$339.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Sea of Thieves than Core i7-12700F - CA$0.62 vs CA$1.28 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 17% better in Sea of Thieves than Ryzen 5 1600X - 265 vs 227 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
227
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$141.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$141.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
265
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
48%
Price, CA$
CA$339
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |