Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2250 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 203 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 105 vs 135 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$379.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$379.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
135 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |