Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v2 outperforms FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v2 is 313 days newer than FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8350 - 156 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
152
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2723 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |