Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v2 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v2 is 690 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-8150 - 93 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 - 125 vs 130 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
90
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |