Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3250 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3250 is 867 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Performs up to 5% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2650 - 159 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$120.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$120.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | Intel Pentium G3250 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |