Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon E5-2650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2604 days newer than Xeon E5-2650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2650 - 194 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2650 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |