Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 367 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$145.0 vs CA$265.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 3300X - CA$0.4 vs CA$0.66 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 11% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-9100F - 401 vs 360 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
360
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
401
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$265
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |