Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms Xeon E5-2640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 867 days newer than Xeon E5-2640.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2640
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 5% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-2640 - 223 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2640 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2640 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$85.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$85.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2640 | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |