Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 313 days older than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 151 vs 150 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
151
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |