Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8300 is 231 days newer than Xeon E5-2630.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2630 - 111 vs 110 FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
111
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |