Buy on Amazon
CA$134.6
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2679 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2620 - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
149
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$134.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4-Core Unlocked Desktop Processor with Radeon Graphics
Buy for CA$134.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
