Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3612 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 82% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2620 - 233 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 58 vs 95 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
233
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |