Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D - 95 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 58% better in New World than Xeon E5-2620 - 153 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
153
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.53/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$692.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$692.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |