Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core i5-9400F

Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Core i5-9400F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-9400F

2.9 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-9400F Logo
Intel Core™ i5-9400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores 4.1 GHz Turbo Without Graphics - 2.9 GHz (BX80684I59400F)

Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 11406 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-9400F

2.9 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-9400F Logo
Intel Core™ i5-9400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores 4.1 GHz Turbo Without Graphics - 2.9 GHz (BX80684I59400F)

Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 11406 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1955 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.

Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2

  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads

Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F

  • Performs up to 12% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 131 vs 117 FPS
  • Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
This is a free version of A Plague Tale: Requiem.
A Plague Tale: Requiem

A Plague Tale: Requiem

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2620 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013


FPS

117

89%

Value, CA$/FPS

Price, CA$

Intel Core i5-9400F Logo
Core i5-9400F

Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019


FPS

131

100%

Value, CA$/FPS

CA$1.17/FPS

100%

Price, CA$

CA$153.88

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core™ i5-9400F Desktop Processor 6 Cores 4.1 GHz Turbo Without Graphics - 2.9 GHz (BX80684I59400F)

Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 11406 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2620 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013

Intel Core i5-9400F Logo
Core i5-9400F

Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 Logo
Xeon E5-2620 v2

Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013


Single-Core

416

30%

Multi-Core

2118

43%

Intel Core i5-9400F Logo
Core i5-9400F

Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019


Single-Core

1378

100%

Multi-Core

4834

100%

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 Logo

Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2

vs
Intel Core i5-9400F Logo

Intel Core i5-9400F

Sep 1st, 2013Release Date
Jan 8th, 2019
Xeon E5CollectionCore i5
Ivy Bridge EPCodenameCoffee Lake
Intel Socket 2011SocketIntel Socket 1151
Server
Segment
Desktop
6Cores6
12
Threads6
2.1 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
4.1 GHz
80 WTDP
65 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
21.0xMultiplier
29.0x
NoneIntegrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Builds Using Xeon E5-2620 v2 or Core i5-9400F

A Plague Tale: Requiem, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.