Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2753 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 159 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
159
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.99/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$156.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$156.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12951 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |