Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 1495 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 23% better in Far Cry 3 than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 148 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
148
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$351.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$351.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |