Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 97% better in War Thunder than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 246 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
246
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.57/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$387
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$387 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |