Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 124 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$466.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$466.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |