Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 54% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 231 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i5-12400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
