Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 15% better in Ready or Not than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 288 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |