Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2609 v2 outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2609 v2 is 2045 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
350
40.415704387990765%
Multi-Core
998
39.275875639512%
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 80 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
