Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1318 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 180 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 12 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$302.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$302.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |