Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 1148 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than FX-4350 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$120.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |