Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1660 v4 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1660 v4 is 1336 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Performs up to 9% better in Remnant II than FX-8320 - 85 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
78
91.76470588235294%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$111.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |