Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 11% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 113 vs 102 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
113
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.65/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$412.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$412.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |