Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2004 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in Rocket League than Xeon E5-1620 - 705 vs 679 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
705
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$209.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |