Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 295 days older than Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
222
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.38/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$307.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$307.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2425 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
96.8833481745325%
Multi-Core
3898
81.78766261015527%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |