Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$307.08 vs CA$411.09
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 18% better in F1 23 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 235 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 16 vs 12 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$307.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Buy for CA$411.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
69.6650124069479%
Multi-Core
4766
65.91066242566727%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |