Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1115 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 1600X - 135 vs 126 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - CA$375.13 vs CA$380.55
- Up to 8% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 1600X - CA$2.78 vs CA$3.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
126
93.33333333333333%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.02/FPS
92.05298013245033%
Price, CA$
CA$380.55
98%
Buy for CA$380.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58291 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$375.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$375.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
69.6650124069479%
Multi-Core
4766
65.91066242566727%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |