Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 2399 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 36% better in Dota 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 260 vs 191 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for CA$269.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76869 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
39.78062157221206%
Multi-Core
3898
31.797047067460642%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |