Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v2 outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v2 is 322 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Performs up to 5% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6300 - 147 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
140
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |