Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 1822 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 6% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 172 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
172
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$78.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$78.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | No |