Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2144 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 26% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-6300 - 91 vs 72 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 24% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - CA$59.57 vs CA$78.5
- Up to 3% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Athlon 200GE - CA$0.83 vs CA$0.86 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
FPS
91
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.86/FPS
96%
Price, CA$
CA$78.5
75%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$78.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16197 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
72
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |