Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 1156 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 80 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 18% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1270 - 190 vs 161 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
190
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.84/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$350
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 88 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |