Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3138 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$350.0 vs CA$1617.19
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-4690K - 131 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 16 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for CA$350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76495 minutes ago
Buy for CA$1,617.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76494 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
1287
56.200873362445414%
Multi-Core
3631
33.79246161005119%
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
88 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |